US sanctions a Chinese facial recognition company with Silicon Valley funding

The US Department of Commerce has sanctioned 14 Chinese tech companies over links to human rights abuses against Uyghur Muslims in Xinjiang, including one backed by a top Silicon Valley investment firm.

DeepGlint, also known as Beijing Geling Shentong Information Technology Co., Ltd., is a facial recognition company with deep ties to Chinese police surveillance, and funding from US-based Sequoia Capital. Today the Commerce Department added it to its Entity List, which restricts US companies from doing business with listed firms without a special license. Sequoia did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

DeepGlint co-founded a facial recognition lab in 2018 with Chinese authorities in Urumqi, the capital of Xinjiang, according to the South China Morning Post. It has also gained international bragging rights through the US National Institute of Standards and Technology’s (NIST) Face Recognition Vendor Test. DeepGlint claimed top accuracy in the test as of January 2021, giving it a potent marketing tool in the security and surveillance industry.

Bill Gates also referred to the startup as “very cool” in 2014

While DeepGlint has been accepted for a public offering on Shanghai’s STAR stock exchange, the firm hasn’t seen the commercial success of other AI startups in the country, explained Jeffrey Ding in his ChinAI newsletter last month. Since the firm is so heavily invested in government work, it has to follow slow government procurement cycles and is unlikely to score huge infrastructure projects, Ding writes.

Sequoia Capital has funded another company that later ended up on the Entity List. In 2020, Sequoia-backed Yitu Technology was added to the list for similar human rights abuses. Sequoia invested in DeepGlint back in 2014, before China’s genocide of Uyghurs had come to light. (The same year, Bill Gates also referred to the startup as “very cool,” according to KrAsia.)

The Commerce Department also sanctioned Xinjiang Lianhai Chuangzhi Company and Chengdu Xiwu Security System Alliance, two subsidiaries of Chinese military contractors. They both offer surveillance equipment and services, according to their websites and academic reports. Xinjiang Lianhai Chuangzhi Company created an AI-powered checkpoint system that is able to track Uyghurs as they move around cities, according to a report from the Italian Institute for International Political Studies.

Another firm sanctioned today is Leon Technology, a surveillance company that was controlled by Chinese AI giant SenseTime until its role providing oppressive technology in Xinjiang was reported in 2019. SenseTime then divested its 51 percent stake in it.

The Commerce Department sanctions also included nine other Chinese companies for national security reasons, as well as companies in Iran, Russia, and Canada, among other countries.

Hot this week

The Myth of Perfect Security

Perfect security is a myth, and focusing on resilience rather than prevention can better protect your organization from inevitable breaches.

Why Traditional Passwords Are Failing Us

Password fatigue from complex rules often causes more security breaches than weak passwords, requiring a shift toward user-friendly tools and behaviors.

Why Your Employees Are Your Best Security Defense

Empowering employees with security awareness training often provides better protection than stacking more technology, turning human factors from a weakness into your strongest defense.

Why Most Security Awareness Training Fails and What to Do About It

Security awareness training often fails because it focuses on knowledge rather than behavior, but shifting to a behavior-based approach can lead to better outcomes and fewer incidents.

The Myth of Multifactor Authentication Security

Multifactor authentication enhances security but is not foolproof, as it can be bypassed through social engineering and technical exploits. Understanding its limitations and adopting stronger methods is essential for effective protection.

Topics

The Myth of Perfect Security

Perfect security is a myth, and focusing on resilience rather than prevention can better protect your organization from inevitable breaches.

Why Traditional Passwords Are Failing Us

Password fatigue from complex rules often causes more security breaches than weak passwords, requiring a shift toward user-friendly tools and behaviors.

Why Your Employees Are Your Best Security Defense

Empowering employees with security awareness training often provides better protection than stacking more technology, turning human factors from a weakness into your strongest defense.

Why Most Security Awareness Training Fails and What to Do About It

Security awareness training often fails because it focuses on knowledge rather than behavior, but shifting to a behavior-based approach can lead to better outcomes and fewer incidents.

The Myth of Multifactor Authentication Security

Multifactor authentication enhances security but is not foolproof, as it can be bypassed through social engineering and technical exploits. Understanding its limitations and adopting stronger methods is essential for effective protection.

Why MFA Is Not Enough Anymore

Multi-factor authentication is no longer a silver bullet for security as attackers develop new bypass methods, requiring a layered defense approach with phishing-resistant tools and continuous monitoring.

Why Phishing Still Works and What to Do About It

Phishing remains a top threat because it exploits human psychology, not just technical gaps. Shifting focus to employee awareness and habits can build stronger defenses than relying solely on technology.

Rethinking Password Security

Complex password rules often increase risk by encouraging poor habits. Learn how password managers and multi-factor authentication offer more practical protection for organizations of all sizes.
spot_img

Related Articles

Popular Categories