US sanctions a Chinese facial recognition company with Silicon Valley funding

The US Department of Commerce has sanctioned 14 Chinese tech companies over links to human rights abuses against Uyghur Muslims in Xinjiang, including one backed by a top Silicon Valley investment firm.

DeepGlint, also known as Beijing Geling Shentong Information Technology Co., Ltd., is a facial recognition company with deep ties to Chinese police surveillance, and funding from US-based Sequoia Capital. Today the Commerce Department added it to its Entity List, which restricts US companies from doing business with listed firms without a special license. Sequoia did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

DeepGlint co-founded a facial recognition lab in 2018 with Chinese authorities in Urumqi, the capital of Xinjiang, according to the South China Morning Post. It has also gained international bragging rights through the US National Institute of Standards and Technology’s (NIST) Face Recognition Vendor Test. DeepGlint claimed top accuracy in the test as of January 2021, giving it a potent marketing tool in the security and surveillance industry.

Bill Gates also referred to the startup as “very cool” in 2014

While DeepGlint has been accepted for a public offering on Shanghai’s STAR stock exchange, the firm hasn’t seen the commercial success of other AI startups in the country, explained Jeffrey Ding in his ChinAI newsletter last month. Since the firm is so heavily invested in government work, it has to follow slow government procurement cycles and is unlikely to score huge infrastructure projects, Ding writes.

Sequoia Capital has funded another company that later ended up on the Entity List. In 2020, Sequoia-backed Yitu Technology was added to the list for similar human rights abuses. Sequoia invested in DeepGlint back in 2014, before China’s genocide of Uyghurs had come to light. (The same year, Bill Gates also referred to the startup as “very cool,” according to KrAsia.)

The Commerce Department also sanctioned Xinjiang Lianhai Chuangzhi Company and Chengdu Xiwu Security System Alliance, two subsidiaries of Chinese military contractors. They both offer surveillance equipment and services, according to their websites and academic reports. Xinjiang Lianhai Chuangzhi Company created an AI-powered checkpoint system that is able to track Uyghurs as they move around cities, according to a report from the Italian Institute for International Political Studies.

Another firm sanctioned today is Leon Technology, a surveillance company that was controlled by Chinese AI giant SenseTime until its role providing oppressive technology in Xinjiang was reported in 2019. SenseTime then divested its 51 percent stake in it.

The Commerce Department sanctions also included nine other Chinese companies for national security reasons, as well as companies in Iran, Russia, and Canada, among other countries.

Hot this week

Why Hiding Cloud Resources Increases Your Security Risks

Obscuring cloud resources creates dangerous blind spots rather than security. Learn why visibility with proper controls outperforms secrecy every time.

Compliance Alone Leaves You Vulnerable to Attack

Passing compliance audits doesn't prevent breaches. Learn why attackers target compliant organizations and how to build real security beyond checklists.

Your Vulnerability Management Is Broken Because of CVSS Blind Spots

Overreliance on CVSS scores creates vulnerability management blind spots that expose organizations to real risks. Learn how to prioritize based on business context and actual threats instead of arbitrary scores.

Why Perfect Security Is an Illusion and What to Do Instead

Chasing 100% vulnerability elimination creates false security. True protection comes from prioritizing business critical risks, implementing compensating controls, and building incident response resilience.

When Security Automation Creates Dangerous Blind Spots

Over reliance on security automation creates dangerous blind spots. Learn why human oversight remains irreplaceable and practical steps to balance both.

Topics

Why Hiding Cloud Resources Increases Your Security Risks

Obscuring cloud resources creates dangerous blind spots rather than security. Learn why visibility with proper controls outperforms secrecy every time.

Compliance Alone Leaves You Vulnerable to Attack

Passing compliance audits doesn't prevent breaches. Learn why attackers target compliant organizations and how to build real security beyond checklists.

Your Vulnerability Management Is Broken Because of CVSS Blind Spots

Overreliance on CVSS scores creates vulnerability management blind spots that expose organizations to real risks. Learn how to prioritize based on business context and actual threats instead of arbitrary scores.

Why Perfect Security Is an Illusion and What to Do Instead

Chasing 100% vulnerability elimination creates false security. True protection comes from prioritizing business critical risks, implementing compensating controls, and building incident response resilience.

When Security Automation Creates Dangerous Blind Spots

Over reliance on security automation creates dangerous blind spots. Learn why human oversight remains irreplaceable and practical steps to balance both.

Why Over Trusting Cybersecurity AI Weakens Your Defenses

Over-reliance on AI tools degrades human security skills while creating new vulnerabilities, requiring balanced collaboration between analysts and technology.

When More Security Tools Create More Risk

Adding security tools often increases risk through complexity. Learn how consolidation and staff training create stronger defenses than endless tool accumulation.

Firewalls Create Dangerous False Security and What to Do Instead

Firewalls create dangerous security illusions by focusing exclusively on perimeter defense while attackers exploit internal network vulnerabilities through lateral movement after inevitable breaches occur.
spot_img

Related Articles

Popular Categories